Back in June, Facebook summed up one new feature that tells her mobile app users if they are an article ready to share is more than three months. While users are not prevented from sharing an older article, Facebook said at the time when it was a attempts to get people to stop and think about what they would share – so hopefully users will read the article and analyze if it was from a legitimate source or if it provided the most up-to-date information on a topic certain or event.
Now Facebook is going one step further. David Gillis, a Facebook stylist, tweeted the social media company is changing that notice to include information about the source of the connection, when it was first registered online, and when the article was first shared on Facebook. Also, if the post contains any information about cOvid-19, will also have a relationship with an official covid-19 information page cured by Facebook.
However, if a user shares information from a trusted health authority, e.g. World Health Organization, they will not receive a notice. According to Facebook, this will “ensure that people have access to reliable information about covid-19 by global health authorities. ”
The list when a website was first registered was created to help slow down dissemination of misinformation, but if one does not understand the importance of that registration date, will not be so useful. Domain age is one of the few determining factors of a website ‘Reliability, but without actually reading the text, checking the links, and digging into the original sources, the age of the domain does not mean much on its own.
Moreover it is that some users may confuse time frame “recorded” with the original date of publication of the article, or confuse the “first shared” date with the original date of publication.
There they are enough sites digging up old news stories, rewrite those with little or no attribute or acknowledging the date of original publication from the original source, and then publishing itFordo thing for the sake of turmoilraises controversy. These stories can go viral on Facebook, and I’m not sure including source link or domain era will help prevent the spread.
There are also cases of “news” or “opinion” websites that also maintain a Facebook page, violating Facebook rules for sharing sponsored or paid partnership content. In short, sponsored content sharing should be disclosed to Facebook users and content can only be considered sponsored if a creator is paid to do something to promote a brand, for example. A news outlet can’t pay another newspaper to share news stories on its Facebook page and call it a “paid partnership”. This happened recently with the Facebook page Mad World News, which the social network demonstrated.
Seedlings can be helpful in curbing the spread of misinformation on the internet is if any algorithm that Facebook is using to generate these notifications also scrapit is page to see if it quotes an original source and what is that original source. “This news story originally came from the X or Y edition. “ it is something that is easier and more useful to understand than the age of the domain, especially if the website you are reporting on is new but legitimate publication and there is still a way to go to build a strong influence.
Or, you know, anyone could read Facebook page how to discover a fake story, which actually has good strategies on how to properly analyze a news source.